Finally. The Democratic primaries have come to an end. After months of relentless crapshots, Barak Obama has finally declared himself the nominee while Hillary Clinton did everything but concede defeat.
I am not really an expert on politics, nor take any real active interest in it, but for some reason I had hoped Hillary Clinton to clinch the nomination. Not because she is a woman, but something about her clicked with me. And something about Obama didn’t. I have listened to a few of his speeches, but his jargon about change change change gets to me. There is a sense of vagueness about him that doesn’t seem right. Sure, he’s a great orator and speaks well, almost reminding me of Martin Luther King, but there’s a small difference. Martin Luther King fought for the people, while Obama is fighting for presidency disguising it as a fight for the people in the name of change. And that bothers me.
Secondly, I am not sure given how conservative some states are and some swing states, whether he can sustain the momentum to carry his good charm forward. Sure, he has almost assured the minority vote for himself, but will that help him through the religious states is another story. Like it or hate it, one can’t deny Clinton’s dent in galvanizing masses, at least amongst less educated people and lower class working people. Which to me is pretty important - almost akin to the fight between educated mass that BJP tried to woo and the common uneducated people that Sonia got for herself by wooing them, and in the end proved to be the difference.
Which leads me to believe, Obama still needs Clinton around if he needs to succeed in his quest for presidency. An Obama-Clinton ticket is a dream ticket, FOR Obama. I still believe that the reverse situation would not have made a difference to electoral results. I.E, Clinton without Obama would still clinch this election on her own. I don’t know why I say this (heck I am not supporting this with any supporting facts), but gut feeling tells me that Clinton would have clinched this election even without Obama by her side.
But Obama without Clinton by her side surely looks like a challenging prospect. I still think democrats will win the election, but it will be interesting to watch how Obama plays it out further and whether his theme resonates till November. I for one am already bored by his change-change-change theme.
Not to mention, the other reason I preferred Clinton over Obama was the India factor. Both Bill and Hillary have had excellent relations with India, and with her around, it would have been a neat little relationship at the top. With Obama its a little quirky.
Anyways, that’s about it for my political ramble for a while. Oh well, 7 years down the line, I am ready for a change myself LOL - I’d like to see some democratic way of running the government.
I disagree (obviously). Couple of months ago, I would have preferred either. But as the race dragged on, the candidates character, constructed or otherwise was revealed. Hillary wanted to win at all cost regardless of the impact of her hypocritical positions, McCain leaned to the far right to appease the base and lost his independent image, and Obama although had ‘pastor’ problems, he hasn’t IMO been guilty of any character flaws yet. He maintains a stoic and cool image even under duress. I would like that in a leader especially in today’s paranoid America. Relationships with allies like India are beyond who is in the White House (remember Bush is heavily pro-India).
Obama’s change and hope speeches may get boring after a while but understand the underlying assumption of humility and intentions (he has promised to backtrack all Bush’s unconstitutional EOs). A Democrat will win this November but chances will be greatly reduced depending on how long Hillary manages to blackmail Democrats into giving her a role. The Veep position is beneficial to neither Hillary nor Barack.
@Patrix: If Obama comes out in support for Palestine or ends the Israel-Palestine conflict, I will commend him as the one who brought about change. [I dont see that happening simply because the Israeli lobby has too much money and investment in America at stake
]
If he brings universal health-care to everybody out here, not at the price of making taxes miserable, I will admire him. [Again, not happening, not with insurance lobbies here]
If his idea of change involves getting troops out of Iraq, now after all this destruction and leaving the country to fend for itself, then I don’t think he’s changing anything. Its only going to come back to haunt him several years from now. He plans to get back troops, but err, does he have plan on what is to be done with Iraq? And what about Afghanistan? His stance on Iran isn’t dramatically different from any other politician either. [His foreign policies, especially Iraq/Afghanistan seems hopelessly self-centered. His idea seems to be - heck, the previous president caused this mayhem, not me - I can do good by leaving this mess and running back ]
The problem is I find Obama-talk too idealist. If he succeeds, I would obviously respect him a hell of a lot more
I am not saying Clinton has any better solutions to these problems either, but at least she passes off as a wily cunning politician whom I can put the blame on hehe
Thanks for stopping by!
S